Price v. Tunica County, Mississippi et al
| Bernard Price |
| Tunica County, Mississippi, James Dunn, Cedrick Burnette, Paul Battle, III, Bobby Williams, Billy Pegram, K. C. Hamp and Unknown Unnamed Officers and Agents |
| 2:2008cv00262 |
| December 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Tunica |
| David A. Sanders |
| W. Allen Pepper |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
ORDER granting 69 Motion in Limine; granting 72 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 73 Motion in Limine; finding as moot 77 Motion in Limine. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 8/5/2011. (pls)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER denying 53 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 9/2/2010. (pls, USDC)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER granting 57 Motion to Continue Consideration re Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 59 Motion to Continue trial. Trial continued from July 12, 2010 to May 23, 2011. Signed by W. Allen Pepper on 3/25/2010. (pbs, USDC)
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER granting in part 40 Motion to Compel. Signed by David A. Sanders on 11/20/2009. (sef)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Discovery due by 2/26/2010. Motions due by 3/12/2010.. Signed by David A. Sanders on 11/19/2009. (sef, USDC)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER STAYING CASE. Signed by David A. Sanders on 4/1/09. (ncb, USDC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
