Britton v. Southaven Police Department et al
| Meika DeSean Britton |
| Southaven Police Department, Brennon Rushing, Steve Pirtle, Frank Caswell, Bonita Clark, Gerald W. Chatham, Sr., Robert R. Morris, III and Marshall Fisher |
| 3:2016cv00084 |
| May 9, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Oxford Division Office |
| De Soto |
| S. Allan Alexander |
| Michael P. Mills |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
91
ORDER denying 87 Motion to Alter Judgment. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 8/18/17. (cr)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 5/30/17. (cr)
|
|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT - Plaintiff's objections to Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED; Report and Recommendations APPROVED AND ADOPTED; all claims DISMISSED with prejudice EXCEPT claim of illegal search and seizure as to defendants Rushing, Caswell, and Clark. Marshall Fisher (Mississipi Department of Corrections), Robert R. Morris, III (Assistant District Attorney), Steve Pirtle (Chief of Police), Gerald W. Chatham, Sr (Circuit Court Judge) and City of Southaven terminated. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 1/31/17. (cr)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO COMPLETE AND RETURN IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION, AUTHORIZATION AND CERTIFICATE. Signed by Magistrate Judge S. Allan Alexander on 5/12/16. (rel)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
