Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Britton v. Cain et al
as 4:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton and Meika DeSean Britton *DO NOT FILE*
Defendant:
Nathan Burl Cain, LeAnne McClure, Marc McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Britton v. Gaston et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton
Defendant:
Milton Gaston, Anderson Johnson, Daphne Gallion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Meika Britton v. Georgia Shelby
as 19-60905
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN GEORGIA SHELBY
Petitioner / Appellant:
MEIKA DESEAN BRITTON
Britton v. Errington et al
as 1:2019cv00840
Defendant:
Laura Tilley, Pelicia Hall, Timothy Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. Shelby et al
as 3:2019cv00016
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and Warden Georgia Shelby
Petitioner:
Meika DeSean Britton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Britton v. City of Southaven et al
as 3:2018cv00204
Defendant:
Bonita Clark, City of Southaven, David Delgado and others
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Meika Britton v. Southaven Police Department, et al
as 17-60432
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEIKA DESEAN BRITTON
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTHAVEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRENNON RUSHING, Detective Southaven Police Department, STEVE PIRTLE, Chief of Police and others
Britton v. Turner
as 3:2017cv00011
Petitioner:
Meika DeSean Britton
Respondent:
Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Britton v. Turner
as 1:2016cv00433
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton
Defendant:
Marshall Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Britton v. Southaven Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv00084
Plaintiff:
Meika DeSean Britton
Defendant:
Southaven Police Department, Brennon Rushing, Steve Pirtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
