Wood et al v. North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Stanley Wood and Chastity Wood
Defendant: North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc., John Does 1-10, Alliance Collection Service, Inc. and Tupelo Service Finance, Inc.
Case Number: 3:2020cv00065
Filed: February 26, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi
Presiding Judge: Michael P Mills
Referring Judge: Roy Percy
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15:1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2020 Intradistrict Transfer to Aberdeen Division; New Case Number 1:20cv42-MPM-RP (jla)
March 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion to Change Venue; case transferred to Aberdeen Division. Signed by District Judge Michael P. Mills on 3/12/20. (jla)
March 3, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Change Venue from Oxford Division to Aberdeen Division by Chastity Wood, Stanley Wood. (Tucker, Lawrence)
February 26, 2020 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge Roy Percy. (tab)
February 26, 2020 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Alliance Collection Service, Inc., North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc., Tupelo Service Finance, Inc. E-mailed to attorney for service. (tab)
February 26, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number MSN30001776832, filed by Stanley Wood, Chastity Wood. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (tab)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wood et al v. North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alliance Collection Service, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tupelo Service Finance, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Stanley Wood
Represented By: Lawrence John Tucker, Jr.
Represented By: Hal S. Spragins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Chastity Wood
Represented By: Lawrence John Tucker, Jr.
Represented By: Hal S. Spragins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?