Austin v. Mathis et al
| Julie Austin |
| Theresa Mathis, Broderick Rogers, Oxford Police Department, Hardy Meeks, Ryan Baker, Lafayette County Sherriffs Dept., Brad McDivitt, Steve Allen, Andrea Sanders, Jennifer Chandler and Serena Ellison |
| 3:2022cv00138 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
| Debra M Brown |
| Roy Percy |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice; terminating as moot #2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis and #3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel. CASE CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Debra M. Brown on 8/23/22. (jla)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE regarding subject matter jurisdiction. Show Cause Response due by 8/16/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy Percy on 8/1/2022. (yf)
|
| NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Brown and Magistrate Judge Percy. (jla) |
| Filing 4 Consent & Registration Form to Receive Documents Electronically (jla) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Julie Austin. (jla) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed in forma pauperis by Julie Austin. (jla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT, Jury Demand,, filed by Julie Austin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (jla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
