Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Austin v. Mathis et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Julie Austin
Defendant:
Theresa Mathis, Broderick Rogers, Oxford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
CHANDLER v. ALZA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2021cv12466
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN ORTHO, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CHANDLER
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler et al v United States of America
as 2:2021cv00025
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Chandler and James Chandler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Chandler et al v United States of America
as 4:2021cv00370
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Chandler and James Chandler
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv01161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cosentino et al v. Transcend Services, Inc.
as 1:2012cv03627
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Zier-Teitler, Margaret E. Mackey, Denese Dugay and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chandler v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
as 3:2010cv00316
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Chandler and Alysia Chandler
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chandler v. Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A.
as 5:2010cv00372
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Chandler and Alysia Chandler
Defendant:
Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A., Yamaha Motor Manufacturing Corporation of America and Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
