Chandler et al v United States of America
| Jennifer Chandler and James Chandler |
| United States of America |
| 2:2021cv00025 |
| March 25, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7422 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by James Chandler. Defendant All Plaintiffs. (Kutten, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/27/2021: #1 summons) (MCB). |
| Filing 2 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to electronic case opening, the above numbered case was inadvertently opened in error in the Eastern Division. Therefore, this case will be administratively closed. The new case number in the Northern Division is 2:21cv25 HEA. (BAK) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant James Chandler, Jennifer Chandler with receipt number AMOEDC-8551975, in the amount of $402 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by James Chandler, Jennifer Chandler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Waiver of Service)(Kutten, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/25/2021: #4 Summons, #5 Summons) (BAK). |
| Case Opening Notification: 2 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney James Allan Kutten. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
