Haughton v. State of Mississippi et al
Andrea T. Haughton |
State of Mississippi and MDOC |
4:2023cv00118 |
June 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi |
Michael P Mills |
Jane M Virden |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #7 Order Setting PSP Deadline. (tab) |
Filing 7 ORDER Setting PSP Deadline: PSP Forms due by 9/5/2023.. Signed by Clerk on 8/3/23. (jla) |
Filing 6 NOTICE/MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Andrea T. Haughton; document submitted electronically. (tab) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge; document submitted electronically. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden. (tab) |
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT re #3 Order; document submitted electronically. (tab) |
Filing 3 ORDER Requiring Plaintiff to Complete and Return In Forma Pauperis Application. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jane M. Virden on 7/5/2023. (tab) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT. Case assigned to Judge Michael P Mills and Magistrate Judge Jane M Virden. (tab) |
Filing 1 PRISONER COMPLAINT challenging conditions of confinement,, filed by Andrea T. Haughton. (Attachments: #1 MDOC Administrative Remedy Program, #2 Exhibit B Sunflower Circuit Court Order) (tab) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Mississippi Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.