Lincoln v. Astrue
| Evelyn J Lincoln |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| 1:2008cv00082 |
| May 30, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits Office |
| Cape Girardeau |
| Mary Ann L. Medler |
| E. Richard Webber |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 42:205 Denial Social Security Benefits |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER...IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Application for Attorneys Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act [doc. #21] is GRANTED in the amount of Two Thousand Two Hundred Fifty-Five Dollars and Fourteen Cents ($2,255.14) for attorneys fees and expenses, and that the award shall be made payable to Evelyn J. Lincoln, 377 County Road 441, Jackson, MO 63755. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 7/15/10. (MRS)
|
|
Filing
23
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 21 MOTION for Attorney Fees Application for Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act filed by Plaintiff Evelyn J Lincoln motion is GRANTED in the amount of Two Thousand TwoHundred Fifty-Five Dollars and Fourteen Cents ($2,255.14) for attorneys fees and expenses, and that the award shall be made payable to the law firm of Lichtenegger, Weiss & Fetterhoff LLC. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 6/22/10. (cc: Financial)(MRS)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Social Security Brief filed by Evelyn J Lincoln, 18 Report and Recommendations, 17 Social Security Cross Brief, Motion for Relief filed by Michael J. Astrue. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that under sente nce four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), the finaldecision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff Evelyn Lincoln's disability benefits is REVERSED, and the case is remanded to the Commissioner for further proceedings. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 7/31/09. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
18
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 15 SOCIAL SECURITY BRIEF filed by Evelyn J Lincoln, 17 SOCIAL SECURITY CROSS BRIEF filed by Michael J. Astrue Objections to R&R due by 7/20/2009...IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this matter be reversed and remanded; I T IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that a Judgment of Reversal and Remand issue remanding this case to the Commissioner of Social Security for further consideration pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), sentence 4.IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that upon entry of the Judgm ent, the appeal periodwill begin which determines the thirty (30) day period in which a timely application for attorneys fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, may be filed.8. Signed by Mag Judge Mary Ann L. Medler on 7/8/09. (MRS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Lincoln v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evelyn J Lincoln | |
| Represented By: | Chris N. Weiss |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
