Fuller v. Astrue
| Gena G. Fuller |
| Michael J. Astrue |
| 2:2012cv00056 |
| August 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Randolph |
| Nannette A. Baker |
| Stephen N. Limbaugh |
| Disability Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), plaintiff's attorney is awarded attorneys fees in the amount of $5075.00.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant shall pay the attorney's fees in the amo unt of $5075.00, paid directly to plaintiffs attorney, Frank T. Koch of Harlan, Harlan & Still. The payment shall be mailed to plaintiff's attorney, Frank T. Koch, Harlan, Harlan & Still, 515 Cherry Street, Suite 300, P.O. Box 933, Columbia, Missouri 65205. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that plaintiff's attorney shall reimburse plaintiff for the $2695.74 previously awarded in EAJA fees. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/23/2016. (JMC)
|
|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION for Attorney Fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act filed by Plaintiff Gena G. Fuller. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's Application for Attorney's Fees under the Equal Access to Just ice Act (ECF #26) is GRANTED and plaintiff is awarded attorney's fees in the amount of $2,695.74. IT IS FURTHER ORDERD that defendant shall pay attorney's fees in the amount of $2,695.74, paid directly to plaintiff's attorney , Frank T. Koch of Harlan, Harlan & Still, subject to any pre-existing debt that the plaintiff owes to the United States. The payment shall be mailed to plaintiff's attorney, Frank T. Koch, Harlan, Harlan & Still, 515 Cherry Street, Suite 300, P.O. Box 933, Columbia, Missouri 65205. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 5/7/14. (CSG)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the report and recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Nannette A. Baker (#24), filed December 30, 2013, be and is SUSTAINED, ADOPTED and INCORPORATED herein. IT IS FINALL Y ORDERED that the Commissioner of Social Security's decision be and is REVERSED and, pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to the report and recommendation adopted herein. This Court does not retain jurisdiction of this case. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 1/21/2014. (JMC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fuller v. Astrue | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gena G. Fuller | |
| Represented By: | Frank T. Koch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Michael J. Astrue | |
| Represented By: | Jane Rund |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
