Anthony v. Northeast Correctional Center et al
Marcus Tremayne Anthony |
Richard Scott Griggs, Unknown Schliechting, Unknown Ruby, Unknown Uebinger, Frederick Stockton, Jacob Baker, Renee Wambles, Kristin Cutt, David Cutt, Richard Hartwig, Tyree Butler, Northeast Correctional Center, Unknown Wood, James Hurley, William Jones and Alan Earls |
2:2014cv00094 |
September 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Hannibal Office |
Pike |
Catherine D. Perry |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint as to defendants Ruby, Schlichting, Kuntz, and Uebinger, in their individual capacities. These defendants shall be served ac cording to the waiver agreements the Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney Generals Office and Corizon Medical Services. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants Ruby, Schlichting, Kuntz, and Uebinger s hall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue upon the comp laint as to defendants NECC, Corizon, and Hurley because, as to these defendants, the complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's claims against def endants in their official capacity are subject to dismissal because these claims are legally frivolous or fail to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. An Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 12/30/14. (EAB) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 11/12/2014. (CBL) |
Filing 6 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for an extension of time to file his amended complaint is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint no later than December 5, 2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice.( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 12/5/2014.) Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on November 4, 2014. (MCB) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. (see order for details) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.70 within th irty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the r emittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mail to plaintiff a prisoner civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file an amended complaint no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. Signed by District Judge Catherine D. Perry on 10/22/2014. (Order and §1983 Complaint forms sent to plaintiff this date.)(CBL) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.