Dawdy v. Allen et al
| Craig Dawdy |
| Larry Allen, Troy Bartley, Frank Campbell, Travis Case, Alan Earls, Chantay Godert, Richard Griggs, James Hurley, William Jones, Gil Long, Shelly Orf, Murry Phillips, Anne Precythe, Sheri Brothers and Renee Wembles |
| 2:2017cv00049 |
| July 25, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Pike |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a third amended complaint is GRANTED. ECF No. 34 . The Clerk of Court shall detach and docket the third amended complaint, which was attached to the motion f or leave (ECF No. 34-1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent the third amended complaint attempts to re-plead any claims that the Court previously dismissed, such claims are again DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the third amended complaint pursuant to the service agreement the Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney General's Office as to defendant Doug Worsham. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 5/29/2019. (AFC)
|
|
Filing
27
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HERBY ORDERED that defendants Larry Allen, Troy Bartley, Travis Case, Alan Earls, Chantay Godert, Richard Griggs, James Hurley, William Jones, Gil Long, Murry Phillips, Anne Precythe, Sheri Brothers, and Renee Wembles� 39; motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is GRANTED on the grounds of Eleventh Amendment immunity to the extent that the state official defendants are named in their official capacities for liability for monetary dama ges, and DENIED in all other respects. [ECF No. 21 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel is DENIED without prejudice. [ECF No. 25 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a hearing is DENIED as moot. [ECF No. 26 ] An Order of Partial Dismissal will accompany this Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 3/13/2019. (AFC)
|
|
Filing
13
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is GRANTED. [ECF No. 9 ] IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall detach and docket the second amended complaint, which was submitted as an attachment to the motion for leave. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the second amended complaint pursuant to the service agreement the Court maintains with the Missouri Attorney General's Office as to defendant Renee Wombles. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on April 30, 2018. (BRP)
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER : IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs claims brought under the Eighth Amendment are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue process or cause process to issue against defendants Shelly Orf and Renee Wombles because, as to these defendants, the amended complaint is legally frivolous or fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or both. Plaintiffs claims in the amended complaint against Shelly Orf and Renee Wombles are DISMISSED without prejudice.. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on 02/21/2018. (KCB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
