McAllister v. Redington
| Eugene McAllister |
| Daniel Redington |
| 2:2022cv00002 |
| January 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Matthew T Schelp |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 1/24/2022. (TMT)
|
|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, Doc. #2 , is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioners motion to withdraw his 28 U.S.C. 2241 petition, Doc. #5 , is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. Signed by District Judge Matthew T. Schelp on 1/24/2022. (TMT)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6, 7. Mon Jan 24 11:14:08 CST 2022 (Tillman, Tiffani)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Withdraw Petition by Petitioner Eugene McAllister. (BRP) |
| Filing 4 CLERK'S ORDER (GJL) - Due to a clerical error, the case was randomly assigned as an Eastern Division case. The case should have been filed in the Northern Division. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above styled case is transferred to the Northern Division and randomly reassigned to the Honorable Matthew T. Schelp, United States District Judge, under cause number 2:22-cv-00002-MTS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that cause number 4:22-cv-00074-SRC is hereby administratively closed. In all future documents filed with the Court, please use the following case number 2:22-cv-00002-MTS. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Jan 20 15:01:20 CST 2022 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Stephen R. Clark. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Petitioner Eugene McAllister. (DLB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT - HABEAS CASES by Petitioner Eugene McAllister. (DLB) |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2241 by Petitioner Eugene McAllister. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Judge Assignment Label, #4 Envelope) #5 Original Filing Form) (DLB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: McAllister v. Redington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Eugene McAllister | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Daniel Redington | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
