Jacobs v. Redington
| Timothy Jacobs |
| Daniel Redington |
| 2:2022cv00055 |
| August 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Hannibal Office |
| Abbie Crites-Leoni |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 10. Thu Sep 22 09:59:31 CDT 2022 (Carter, Jessica)
|
|
Filing 10
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion to transfer venue in this closed action [ECF No. 8] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not accept any additionally filed motions or documents in this action except for a Notice of Appeal. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/21/2022. (JMC)
|
|
Filing 9
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of this action [ECF No. #5 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to amend his petition [ECF No. #6 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's request for application for writ of mandamus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any future documents or pleadings in this action shall be filed in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, except for a Notice of Appeal. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 9/21/2022. (HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 9. copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Wed Sep 21 15:52:55 CDT 2022 (Aubuchon, Heather)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Change Venue by Petitioner Timothy Jacobs. (JMC)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Change of Address by Petitioner Timothy Jacobs. (JMC)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Amend/Correct Habeas Corpus Petition by Petitioner Timothy Jacobs. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (page 5 and 6 of requested document forwarded to Mr. Jacobs)(JMC)
|
|
Filing 5
PRO SE MOTION for Relief from Order Under Rule 60(b) by Petitioner Timothy Jacobs. (JMC)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28USCS2254 is DENIED AND DISMISSED due to petitioner's failure to exhaust his state court remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's claims regarding his loss of property are DENIED without prejudice as non-cognizable in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/25/2022. (HMA)
|
|
Filing 3
OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's application for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DENIED AND DISMISSED for failure to exhaust state court remedies. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner's claims regarding his loss of property are DENIED without prejudice as non-cognizable in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no certificate of appealability shall issue. A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Opinion, Memorandum and Order. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 8/25/2022. (HMA)
|
|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 3, 4 . copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Thu Aug 25 16:34:53 CDT 2022 (Aubuchon, Heather)
|
|
Filing 2
Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Petitioner Timothy Jacobs. (Attachments: #1 Supplemental, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Original Filing Form, #4 Correspondence, #5 Envelopes)(JWD) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/9/2022 due to scanning error) (JWD).
|
|
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Abbie S. Crites-Leoni. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Mon Aug 22 16:01:23 CDT 2022 (admin,)
|
|
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jacobs v. Redington | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Timothy Jacobs | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Daniel Redington | |
| Represented By: | Office of Missouri Attorney General - Habeas Division |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
