Avante International Technology, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc. et al
| Avante International Technology, Inc. |
| Premier Election Solutions, Inc., Election Systems & Software, Inc. and Sequoia Voting Systems |
| 4:2008cv01367 |
| September 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Patent Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| E. Richard Webber |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 35:271 Patent Infringement |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CLAIM CONSTRUCTION Conclusion: Five references in the '787 Patent, four in the '209 Patent, and two in the'150 Patent were submitted to the Court for construction. That construction is set forth above. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on October 13, 2009. (MCB)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 44 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Mediation. Designation of Neutral and ADR Conference Report due by 5/19/2009. Signed by Mag Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 5/13/09. (RJD)
|
|
Filing
30
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Reassign/Transfer Case in the Interest of Judicial Economy [doc. #22] is GRANTED. The case is reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert. All further pleadings shall bear the cause number 4:08CV01367 TCM. Signed by Honorable E. Richard Webber on 1/20/09. (RJD) Forwarded to OSU for reassignment (KLH).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
