Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00061
In_re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested_party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Avante International Technology, Inc. et al v. Sequoia Voting Systems
as 4:2010cv00799
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ting-Wah Chu, Kevin Kwong-Tai Chung, Avante International Technology, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sequoia Voting Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Franklin Inventions, LLC v. Election Systems & Software, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00377
Defendant:
Election Systems & Software Inc, Premier Election Solutions Inc, Hart InterCivic Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Inventions LLC
Petitioner:
UHY Advisors FLVS Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Avante International Technology, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv01367
Plaintiff:
Avante International Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Premier Election Solutions, Inc., Election Systems & Software, Inc. and Sequoia Voting Systems
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Avante International Technology, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00587
Plaintiff:
Avante International Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Premier Election Solutions, Inc. and Sequoia Voting Systems
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Avante International Technology Corp. v. Diebold Election Systems et al
as 1:2007mc00063
Plaintiff:
Avante International Technology Corp.
Defendant:
Diebold Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Sequoia Voting Systems and others
Movant:
Thomas Swidarski and Thomas Swidarski
Avante International Technology, Inc. v. Premier Election Solutions, Inc., et al
as 4:2006cv00978
Defendant:
Sequoia Voting Systems, Premier Election Solutions, Inc. and Election Systems & Software, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Avante International Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
