Davis v. State of Missouri et al
Plaintiff: Fredrick James Davis
Defendant: State of Missouri, St. Louis Clayton County, St. Louis County Justice Services and St. Louis County Justice Services Medical Department
Case Number: 4:2009cv00281
Filed: February 19, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: Prisoner: Civil Rights Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: Thomas C. Mummert
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 22 is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will waive the filing fee associated with this proceeding due to plaintiff's insu fficient funds. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall issue process or cause process to issue upon the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(g)(2), defendants St. Louis County, Charles Dooley, Julia Childrey, St. Louis County Justice Services, and St. Louis County Justice Services Medical Department shall reply to plaintiff's claims within the time provided by the applicable provisions of Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is assigned to Track 5B: Prisoner Standard. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 10/15/10. (TRC)
July 27, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs post-dismissal motions toamend his complaint and for appointment of counsel [Doc. #15 and #17] areDENIED as the Court is without jurisdiction to entertain the motions given that the matter is currently on appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. 15 17 Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 7/27/10. (CLA)
March 25, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal 9 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, either pay the $455 appellate filing f ee or file a motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall file any future documents or pleadings in connection with his appeal directly with the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 3/25/09. (TRC)
March 6, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF DISMISSAL pursuant to 28USC1915(e)(2)(B) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED, without prejudice IT IS HEREBY CERTIFIED that an appeal from this dismissal would not be taken in good faith pursuant to 28USC1915(a)(3). Signed by Honorable Henry E. Autrey on 3/6/09. (CEL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. State of Missouri et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Fredrick James Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State of Missouri
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis Clayton County
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis County Justice Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: St. Louis County Justice Services Medical Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?