Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Davis v. Dicus
as 1:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Margaret Dicus and Mississippi County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Frederick
as 4:2013cv00793
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Unknown Frederick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Davis v. Ian Wallace, et al
as 13-1173
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Ian Wallace, Cheryl Thompson, Cynthia Resse and others
Davis v. Wallace et al
as 1:2012cv00198
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Ian Wallace, Cheryl Thompson, Cynthia Resse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredrick Davis v. Jeff Norman, et al
as 11-1190
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Jeff Norman, Warden, Roger Terry, Unknown Christian, Sergeant and others
Davis v. Norman et al
as 1:2010cv00180
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Jeff Norman, Roger Terry, Unknown Christian and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick Davis v. Jennifer Sachse, et al
as 10-3234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Jennifer Sachse, Warden, Brenda Short, Warden, Michael Layden, Superintendent and others
Davis v. Sachse et al
as 4:2010cv01654
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
Jennifer Sachse, Brenda Short, Michael Layden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fredrick Davis v. State of Missouri, et al
as 10-2900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
State of Missouri, Governor Nixon, Boonville Correctional Center and others
Davis v. State of Missouri et al
as 4:2010cv01332
Plaintiff:
Fredrick James Davis
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Governor Nixon, Boonville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
