Ford et al v. St. Louis Metropolitan Towing, L.C. et al
| Vivian Ford and Earl E. Johnson |
| St. Louis Metropolitan Towing, L.C., St.Louis Board of Police Commissioners, St. Louis City,, Chambers and Michel Strong |
| 4:2009cv00512 |
| April 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Henry E. Autrey |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
109
ORDER re: Dismissal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 6/23/2010. (RJD)
|
|
Filing
82
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. ORDERED that Metropolitan Towing's motion to dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Earl Johnson [Doc. 19 ] is GRANTED in part so as to dismiss Plaintiff Johnson's conversion claim in Count II and Plaintiff Johnson's ne gligence claim in Count III. FURTHER ORDERED that Metropolitan Towing's motion to dismiss the claims of Plaintiff Earl Johnson [Doc. 19] is otherwise DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Metropolitan Towing's motion to dismiss Count I [Doc. 17 ] is GRANTED in part so as to dismiss the alleged losses based on the deprivation of the value of the vehicle, the delay in "any recovery" due Plaintiffs under the insurance policy, and Plaintiffs' "loss of time, effort and earnings capacity, humiliation and emotional distress." FURTHER ORDERED that Metropolitan Towing's motion to dismiss Count I [Doc. 17] is otherwise DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that Metropolitan Towing's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims fo r infliction of emotional distress [Doc. 47 ] is GRANTED in part to dismiss the humiliation and emotional distress allegations from the Merchandising Practices Act claim in Count I and the negligence claim in Count III. FURTHER ORDERED that Metropol itan Towing's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' claims for infliction of emotional distress [Doc. 47] is otherwise DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that City's motion to dismiss [Doc. 43 ] is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs' § 1983 cl aimin Count Vbased on an alleged failure properly to train, monitor, or supervise St. Louis police officers, on a "widespread or pervasive custom of the St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department to conspire with "Metropolitan Towing to misus e police authority; and on "[p]olicymakers with final authority on police department policymaking an official decision (or decisions) or otherwise authorizing the practice of conspiring with" Metropolitan Towing. FURTHER ORDERED that City's motion to dismiss [Doc. 43] is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 2/18/10. (KLH)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER (as to Other Defendants) re: 68 MOTION to Compel filed by Plaintiff Vivian Ford, Plaintiff Earl E. Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas C. Mummert, III on 12/23/09. (RJD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
