Cases 1 - 10 of 6,013
Chambers v. Goodman
as 3:2025cv00289
Plaintiff:
Bruce Chambers
Defendant:
Steve Goodman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Cottingham et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv03434
Plaintiff:
Larry Cottingham, Terry Adams, Melissa Adams and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
CHAMBERS et al v. GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
as 2:2025cv02984
Plaintiff:
DEBBIE CHAMBERS and CONNIE LACEY
Defendant:
GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Hopson v. Chambers-Smith
as 5:2025cv00817
Petitioner:
Peyton Hopson
Respondent:
Warden Annette Chambers-Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Butler v. Chambers et al
as 1:2025cv01153
Plaintiff:
Jaylin Butler
Defendant:
Jason Chambers, Kwame Raoul and Nicole Mannen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chambers v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2025cv04118
Plaintiff:
Vicky Chambers
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and SoftSheen-Carson, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chambers v. Thompson et al
as 4:2025cv00530
Plaintiff:
Vincel King Chambers
Defendant:
Lt. Thompson, Lt. Stevenson and Lt. O'Bryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jodie ChambersIn re: Jodie Chambers
as 25-5350
Petitioner:
In re: JODIE CHAMBERS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Chambers v. Combs
as 1:2025cv03217
Defendant:
Sean Combs and P-Diddy
Plaintiff:
Vincel K. Chambers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
