Peeples v. Hurley

Peeples v. Hurley

Petitioner:	Gregory Peeples, Jr.
Respondent:	James Hurley
Case Number:	4:2013cv00399
Filed:	March 1, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Pike
Presiding Judge:	Carol E. Jackson
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 23, 2015	Filing 17 MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that petitioner has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief based on state court proceedings that were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established f ederal law, or based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Petitioner has also failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitut ional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 12/23/2015. (KMS)
March 15, 2013	Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER :IT ISHEREBYORDERED that the Clerk shall return petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus to him. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must sign and return the petition to the Court no later than April 15, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, this action will be dismissed. (Copy of petition mailed to petitioner.) Response to Court due by 4/15/2013.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/15/13. (KKS)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 23, 2015

Filing 17 MEMORANDUM: For the reasons discussed above, the Court concludes that petitioner has failed to establish that he is entitled to relief based on state court proceedings that were contrary to, or an unreasonable application of, clearly established f ederal law, or based upon an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the state court proceedings. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d). Petitioner has also failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitut ional right. Therefore, the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. See Cox v. Norris, 133 F.3d 565, 569 (8th Cir. 1997). A judgment in accordance with this Memorandum will be entered separately. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 12/23/2015. (KMS)

March 15, 2013

Filing 3 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER :IT ISHEREBYORDERED that the Clerk shall return petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus to him. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner must sign and return the petition to the Court no later than April 15, 2013. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner fails to comply with this Order, this action will be dismissed. (Copy of petition mailed to petitioner.) Response to Court due by 4/15/2013.. Signed by District Judge Carol E. Jackson on 3/15/13. (KKS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peeples v. Hurley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Gregory Peeples, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: James Hurley
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?