McGinnist v. Hurley

McGinnist v. Hurley

Petitioner:	Dennis McGinnist
Respondent:	James Hurley
Case Number:	4:2014cv01276
Filed:	July 18, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office:	St. Louis Office
County:	Pike
Presiding Judge:	Abbie Crites-Leoni
Presiding Judge:	Stephen N. Limbaugh
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 1, 2017	Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Crites-Leoni's Report and Recommendation, #35, filed July 25, 2017 is adopted and sustained in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/1/2017. (RHF)
January 6, 2015	Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion For a[n] Order of Stay and Abeyance of Claims Not Preserved in Missouri State Courts (Doc. 5) be and it is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Request for Clarification of Motion For Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 10) be and it is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 4) be and it is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall have thirty days to file a Traverse.( Response to Court due by 2/6/2015.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 1/6/15. (MRS)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 1, 2017

Filing 36 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judge Crites-Leoni's Report and Recommendation, #35, filed July 25, 2017 is adopted and sustained in its entirety. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #1, is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will not issue a certificate of appealability. A separate Judgment in accordance with this Memorandum and Order is entered this same date. Signed by District Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr on 9/1/2017. (RHF)

January 6, 2015

Filing 26 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER..IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioners Motion For a[n] Order of Stay and Abeyance of Claims Not Preserved in Missouri State Courts (Doc. 5) be and it is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Request for Clarification of Motion For Stay and Abeyance (Doc. 10) be and it is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioners Motion to Appoint Counsel (Doc. 4) be and it is denied without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner shall have thirty days to file a Traverse.( Response to Court due by 2/6/2015.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Abbie Crites-Leoni on 1/6/15. (MRS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McGinnist v. Hurley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Dennis McGinnist
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: James Hurley
Represented By:	Stephen D. Hawke
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?