Counts v. State of Missouri et al
James Counts |
State of Missouri, Kelly Parker and Sanborn Ball |
4:2015cv00644 |
April 17, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Within US but Outside District |
Nannette A. Baker |
Mandamus and Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM AND ORDERIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's motion for leave to proceed informa pauperis and motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #2] is GRANTED INPART AND DENIED IN PART. Petitioner is granted in forma pauperis status,and his motion for counsel is denied as moot. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall pay an initial partial filing fee of $56.25 within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. Petitioner is instructed to make his remittance payable to "C lerk, United States District Court," and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the casenumber; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall not issue pr ocess or cause process to issue, because the petition is legally frivolous and fails to state a claimupon which relief may be granted. See 28 U.S.C. ' 1915(e)(2)(B).A separate Order of Dismissal shall accompany this Memorandum and Order. 2 ( Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 6/12/2015.) Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 5/12/15. (CLA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.