Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Araujo et al v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00936
Plaintiff: John Araujo and Kelly Parker
Defendant: Terronda Williams, PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Parker v. Grubhub Holdings Inc.
as 1:2024cv00492
Plaintiff: Kelly Parker
Defendant: Grubhub Holdings Inc. doing business as Grubhub, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DURONIO v. PARKER et al
as 2:2023cv01446
Plaintiff: ROGER F DURONIO
Defendant: KELLY PARKER, ROBIN ALI, PHILLIP R. SELLINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00253
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv08340
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SNIPES v. O'NEILL et al
as 1:2017cv00963
Plaintiff: NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant: JAMES RODERICK O'NEILL, DANIEL LEVINSON, SCOTT LEKAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pham, DDS v. Texas Dental Board Examiner et al
as 1:2017cv01008
Defendant: Emily W. Christy, Lois M. Palermo, R.D.H., Kelly Parker and others
Plaintiff: Tuan Thanh Pham, DDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SNIPES v. FINE et al
as 1:2017cv00912
Plaintiff: NATHYL ARTILLERY SNIPES
Defendant: LAWRENCE JAY FINE, DENISE SHEILA HARSFIELD, KELLY PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03421
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Parker v. Commissioner of Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00352
Plaintiff: Kelly Parker
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?