Rivadeneira v. Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.) et al
Felix Guzman Rivadeneira |
Department of Homeland Security (D.H.S.), Department of Immigration Customs Enforcement (I.C.E.), United States Attorney General, Chief Operator of the Detention Operation Manual, All the Warden of the Jail and Detention Centers contracted by I.C.E., All the Service Processing Centers, All the Contract Detention Facilities and All the Intergovernmental Service Agreement Facilities |
4:2015cv00948 |
June 12, 2015 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
St. Louis Office |
Within US but Outside District |
Ronnie L. White |
Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. 4 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. An Order of Dismissal will be filed separately. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 7/9/15. (KXS) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a copy of the Court's prisoner civil rights complaint form.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk is directed to mail to plaintiff a copy of the motion to pr oceed in forma pauperis form for prisoners. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must file an amended complaint on the Court's form within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is advised that his amended complaint will take the place of his original complaint and will be the only pleading that this Court will review. So, the amended complaint must include all of plaintiffs claims. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff must either pay the $400 filing fee or submit a moti on to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, he must also file a certified copy of his prison account statement for the six-mon thperiod preceding the filing of the complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the Court will dismiss this action without prejudice. If the case is dismissed for non-compliance with thisOrder, the dismissal will not count as a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Response to Court due by 7/17/2015. Signed by District Judge Ronnie L. White on 6/17/15. (JWJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.