Wade v. Account Resolution Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Thomas Wade
Defendant: Account Resolution Corporation, Dennis J. Barton, III and The Barton Law Group, LLC
Case Number: 4:2015cv01354
Filed: August 31, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Office: St. Louis Office
County: St. Louis - County
Presiding Judge: John A. Ross
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 60 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment Against Defendants Dennis Barton III and the Barton Law Group, LLC 34 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 50 isDENIED. This matter is currently set for a jury trial on June 5, 2017. Due to the Court's scheduling conflict, the trial setting must be continued. The Court directs the parties to confer and submit three alternate trial dates no later th an Monday, May 15, 2017. Counsel are reminded of the protective measures set forth in the Court's January 4, 2017 Order (Doc. No. 48). In particular, all communication between the parties shall be in writing, and any communication from Mr. Eason to Defendant Barton shall be directed to Defendant's counsel. ( Response to Court due by 5/15/2017.). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 5/10/17. (KKS)
January 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Disqualify [ 32 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: All communication between the parties shall be in writing; any communication from Mr. Eason to Defendant Barton shal l be directed to Defendant's counsel; Depositions shall be conducted in a designated space in the United States District Court, 111 South 10th Street, 5th Floor, St. Louis, Missouri, by making arrangements with the Office of the Clerk of Court or by telephone at the discretion of Defendant's counsel. The Court will permit Defendant Barton to participate by telephone in any third party depositions; and In the event the parties engage in me(jiation, said mediation shall be conducted in a designated space in this Court (see above) and in separate rooms. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the stay of consideration of Plaintiffs summary judgment motion is LIFTED. Defendants shall respond to Plaintiffs motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order; Plaintiff shall have ten (10) days thereafter to file any reply. Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 1/4/17. (JAB)
August 19, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 27 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Dennis J. Barton and the Barton Law Group, LLC's Motion to Dismiss 11 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than September 9, 2016, counsel shall file with the Clerk of the Court a joint proposed scheduling plan. ( Joint Scheduling Plan due by 9/9/2016.). Signed by District Judge John A. Ross on 8/19/16. (KKS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wade v. Account Resolution Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Thomas Wade
Represented By: James W. Eason
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Account Resolution Corporation
Represented By: Matthew J. Aplington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dennis J. Barton, III
Represented By: Dennis J. Barton, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Barton Law Group, LLC
Represented By: Dennis J. Barton, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?