Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Long et al v. Jordan et al
as 4:2023cv05742
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wade Long and Clyde Kiser
Defendant:
David Jordan, Thomas Keller and Arrigo Carotti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas Robinson v. State of California
as 23-70116
Petitioner:
THOMAS WADE ROBINSON
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Thomas Wade Robinson v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2023cv00836
Plaintiff:
Thomas Wade Robinson
Defendant:
County of San Bernardino, Dr. Mudge, Catherine Leigh Quill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rushing v. Salaman et al
as 8:2022cv01143
Plaintiff:
Carla L. Rushing
Defendant:
Krystal Salaman, Ashley Blue, Douglas Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WADE IV v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv99569
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WADE IV
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv46494
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WADE ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
INGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86647
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WADE INGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GOSSETT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv72330
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
THOMAS WADE GOSSETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas Wade Robinson v. County of San Bernardino et al
as 5:2019cv00007
Respondent:
County of San Bernardino and High Desert Detention Center
Petitioner:
Thomas Wade Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
