Hu v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
| Jiaming Hu |
| United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship & Immigration Service, Elaine Duke, Jefferson B. Sessions, James McCament, Chester Moyer and Christopher Wray |
| 4:2017cv02363 |
| September 6, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' motion to dismiss is DENIED. ECF No. 8 . However, this case is STAYED pending further order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, no later than 14 days after final resolution of the class claims in Nio v. U.S. Dept of Homeland Sec., 323 F.R.D. 28 (D.D.C. 2017), the parties shall confer and Defendants shall file a notice advising the Court of the status of the case, any appropriate motion as to lifting of the stay, and a jo int proposed schedule for the remainder of the litigation, if any. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be deemed closed administratively, for statistical purposes only, subject to reopening upon lifting of the stay or other appropriate Order. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on March 12, 2018. (BRP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
