Nolan v. MetLife Securities, Inc. et al
| Marc J Nolan |
| MetLife Securities, Inc., Michael J Gelina and FINRA Regulation, Inc. |
| 4:2017mc00116 |
| February 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| St. Louis Office |
| St. Louis - City |
| Audrey G. Fleissig |
| Other |
| Civil Miscellaneous Case |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Michael J. Gelina is dismissed from this action without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for entry of default judgment confirming the arbitration award rendered in Marc J. Nolan v. MetLife Securities, Inc., and Michael Gelina, FINRA Arbitration No. 14-01639, is GRANTED. ECF No. 6 . IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all matters in the above-noted arbitration award, including, the expungement of all references t o Occurrence Number 1678183 from Plaintiff Nolan's registration records maintained by the Central Registration Depository, will be treated as if ordered by this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Financial Industry Regulation Authority shal l expunge Plaintiff Nolan's registration records consistent with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff, and that this matter is CLOSED. Signed by District Judge Audrey G. Fleissig on June 13, 2017. (BRP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
