Masrani v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
Abdulrahman Masrani |
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Ann Marie Jordan-Starks, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Christopher Wray, Matthew G. Whitaker, Kirstjen Nielsen and L. Francis Cissna |
4:2019cv00099 |
January 25, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
John A Ross |
Other Statutory Actions |
08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Defendants L. Francis Cissna, Ann Marie Jordan-Starks, Kirstjen Nielsen, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Matthew G. Whitaker, Christopher Wray. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Rund, Jane) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants with receipt number 0865-6997961, in the amount of $400 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Abdulrahman Masrani. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons, #5 Summons, #6 Summons, #7 Summons, #8 Summons, #9 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hacking, James) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/25/2019: #10 Original Filing Form) (BAK). |
Case Opening Notification: 8 Summons(es) issued. The summons were emailed to attorney James O. Hacking, III. Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge John A. Ross. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.