Sutton et al v. Maddox et al
| Ronald Lamont Sutton |
| Narendrasinh Khengar, Gail Maddox, Nicole Massman, Anne L. Precythe and Kelly Morriess |
| 4:2019cv00208 |
| February 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Letter to D.O.C. re:initiation of prisoner's installment payments for filing fee (KJS) |
| Receipt 4644078715 in the amount of $1.75 for PLRA CIVIL FILING FEE on behalf of Sutton, Ronald L (CCAM) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of: ddl. by Plaintiff Ronald Lamont Sutton. (CLA) |
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Amendment to #1 DCM Complaint,, filed by Ronald Lamont Sutton. Related document: #1 DCM Complaint, filed by Ronald Lamont Sutton.(CLA) |
Filing 5
OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. #2 ] is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiff shall pay an initial filing fee of $1.75 within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Plaintiff is instructed to make his remittance payable to Clerk, United States District Court, and to include upon it: (1) his name; (2) his prison registration number; (3) the case number; and (4) that the remittance is for an original proceeding. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [Doc. #4 ] is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall submit an amended complaint containing claims only against the ERDCC defendants, in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth in this Memorandum and Order, no later than twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Memorandum and Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mail to plaintiff three (3) blank forms for the filing of a prisoner civil rights complaint. Plaintiff may request additional forms from the Clerk, as needed. If plaintiff fails to timely comply with this Order, the Court may dismiss this action, without prejudice and without further notice. (Mailed to plaintiff three (3) blank forms for the filing of a prisoner civil rights complaint along with a copy of this order.) ( Amended/Supplemental Pleadings due by 3/6/2019., Initial Partial Filing Fee due by 3/6/2019.) Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/13/19. (KJS)
|
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Tue Feb 12 10:04:33 CST 2019 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: Honorable Henry E. Autrey. (DLB) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (DLB) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Ronald Lamont Sutton. (DLB) |
| Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Ronald Lamont Sutton. (DLB) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS by Plaintiff Ronald Lamont Sutton. (DLB) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT UNDER 42 U.S.C. 1983 against defendant Narendrasinh Khengar, Gail Maddox, Nicole Massman, Kelly Morriess, Anne L. Precythe Jury Demand,, filed by Ronald Lamont Sutton. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Attachment, #3 Correspondence, #4 Envelope, #5 Judge Assignment Label)(DLB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
