Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Sutton v. Eastern District of Missouri Federal Court et al
as 4:2021cv00457
Defendant:
Michelle Schaefer and Eastern District of Missouri Federal Court
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Eastern District of Missouri Federal Court et al
as 4:2021cv00252
Defendant:
Michelle Schaefer and Eastern District of Missouri Federal Court
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Sutton v. Tony Jacques, et al
as 20-3519
Defendant / Appellee:
Amanda Patrick and Tony Jacques
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Ronald Sutton v. Corizon Health Inc., et al
as 20-3482
Defendant / Appellee:
R. Woods, Kimberly L. Weatherford-Williams, Anne L. Precythe and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Ronald Sutton v. Matthew Karshner, et al
as 20-2612
Defendant / Appellee:
Cedric Strange and Matthew Karshner
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Sutton v. Jacques et al
as 1:2020cv00163
Defendant:
Tony Jacques and Amanda Patrick
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Corizon Health Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Defendant:
Joule N. Stevenson, M.D., Dir. of Nursing Dawn Wade, R. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Sutton v. Anne Precythe, et al
as 20-1782
Defendant / Appellee:
Narendrasinh Khengar, Doctor/Medical Director, Kelly Morriss, Warden, Gail Maddox, Health Services Administrator and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Ronald Sutton v. Dunklin County, et al
as 20-1691
Defendant / Appellee:
Bob Holder, Christina Nelson, Dunklin County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Sutton v. Matthew Karshner, et al
as 1:2020cv00014
Defendant:
Cedric Strange and Matthew Karshner
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
