Williams-Norris v. Target Corporation
| Hazel Williams-Norris |
| Target Corporation |
| 4:2019cv02717 |
| October 7, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Jean C Hamilton |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all pending motions are denied without prejudice.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel shall file within sixty (60) days from the dateof this Order, a stipulation for dismissal, a motion for leave to voluntarily dismiss, or a proposedconsent judgment. Failure to timely comply with this Order shall result in the dismissal of thisaction with prejudice. Dismissal Paper(s) due by 1/4/2020.. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/05/2019. (AAS)
|
|
Filing 10
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #9 MOTION for Settlement by Plaintiff Hazel Williams-Norris. (Kunin, Michelle) filed by Hazel Williams-Norris ; SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 11/05/2019. (AAS)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Settlement by Plaintiff Hazel Williams-Norris. (Kunin, Michelle) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING RULE 16 TELEPHONE CONFERENCE - See Order For Full Details - Joint Scheduling Plan due by 11/4/2019. Rule 16 Conference set for 11/14/2019 10:45 AM in Telephone before District Judge Jean C. Hamilton.. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 10/09/2019. (AAS)
|
| Filing 7 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Hazel Williams-Norris.(BAK) |
| Filing 6 SUPPLEMENTAL - State Court Docket Sheet. (BAK) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint by Target Corporation.(Boggs, Beth) |
| Filing 4 ENTRY of Appearance by Beth C. Boggs for Defendant Target Corporation. (Boggs, Beth) |
| Filing 3 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Target Corporation.. (Boggs, Beth) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Target Corporation Sent To: Plaintiff (Attachments: #1 Attachment Notice of Removal Documents)(Boggs, Beth) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 19SL-CC03329, with receipt number BMOEDC-7505181, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Original Filing Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Attachment State Court Pleadings)(Boggs, Beth) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Assigned: U.S. District Judge Jean C. Hamilton. (BAK) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams-Norris v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Beth C. Boggs |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Hazel Williams-Norris | |
| Represented By: | Michelle A. Kunin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
