Saddler v. Carvana LLC
| Richard Saddler |
| Carvana LLC |
| 4:2020cv00105 |
| January 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Henry Edward Autrey |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 MEMORANDUM re #16 Memorandum (Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's "Memorandum in Opposition to Notice to Removal" by Defendant Carvana LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Hearing Transcript, #2 Exhibit 2 - Complaint from First Action)(Brasher, William) |
| Filing 18 MOTION FOR ORAL ARGUMENT AND EVIDENTIARY HEARING Re: Motion to Dismiss, or the Alternative, to Compel Arbitration by Defendant Carvana LLC. (Brasher, William) Modified on 3/6/2020 (MCB). |
| Filing 17 REPLY to Response to Motion re #7 MOTION to Compel MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Stay filed by Defendant Carvana LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Declaration of J. Brown, #2 Exhibit 2 - Docket Sheet for 2006 Charges, #3 Exhibit 3 - Docket Sheet for 2014 Charges)(Lee, Allison) |
| Filing 16 MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION re #1 Notice of Removal by Plaintiff Richard Saddler. (Attachments: #1 affidavit in support)(MCB) (Main Document 16 replaced on 2/21/2020) (MCB). (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/21/2020) (MCB). |
Filing 15
Docket Text ORDER: Re #11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Carvana LLC.; ORDERED GRANTED. DEFENDANT TO FILE ANSWER WITHIN 21 DAYS AFTER THE ENTRY OF THE OPINION RULING ON THE MOTION TO DISMISS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/11/20. (EAB)
|
|
Filing 14
Docket Text ORDER: Re #13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice M. Thomas McFarland by Defendant Carvana LLC.; GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 2/11/20. (EAB)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice M. Thomas McFarland. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-7741990) by Defendant Carvana LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing M. Thomas McFarland)(McFarland, Marshall) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Carvana LLC Sent To: State Court - Executed (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Copy of Notice of Removal filed in Federal Court)(Lee, Allison) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Carvana LLC. (BAK) |
| Filing 10 AFFIDAVIT re #9 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion by Plaintiff Richard Saddler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(BAK) |
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re #7 MOTION to Compel MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Stay filed by Plaintiff Richard Saddler. (BAK) |
| Filing 8 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #7 MOTION to Compel MOTION to Dismiss Case MOTION to Stay filed by Plaintiff Richard Saddler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(BAK) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and MOTION to Dismiss Case, or in the alternative, MOTION to Stay by Defendant Carvana LLC. (BAK) |
| Filing 6 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: Circuit Court, St. Louis County, Missouri, filed by Richard Saddler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(BAK) |
| Case Opening Notification: Judge Direct-Assigned: U.S. District Judge Henry E. Autrey. (BAK) |
| Filing 5 ENTRY of Appearance by Allison Elizabeth Lee for Defendant Carvana LLC. (Lee, Allison) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE OF ORGANIZATIONAL INTERESTS CERTIFICATE by Defendant Carvana LLC. Parent companies: N/A (Members are Carvana Group, LLC and Carvana Co. Sub, LLC), Subsidiaries: N/A, Publicly held company: N/A,. (Brasher, William) |
| Filing 3 ENTRY of Appearance by William A. Brasher for Defendant Carvana LLC. (Brasher, William) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Carvana LLC Sent To: Plaintiff (Brasher, William) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, case number 19SL-CC05679, with receipt number AMOEDC-7706110, in the amount of $400 Jury Demand,, filed by Carvana LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Email Chain, #3 Exhibit C - Email Chain, #4 Exhibit D - Settlement Demand, #5 Exhibit E - Retail Installment Contract & Security Agreement, #6 Exhibit F - State Court File, #7 Exhibit G - Pending Motions in State Court, #8 Exhibit H - Civil Cover Sheet, #9 Exhibit I - Original Filing Form)(Brasher, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Saddler v. Carvana LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Saddler | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Carvana LLC | |
| Represented By: | Allison Elizabeth Lee |
| Represented By: | William A. Brasher |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
