Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Richard Saddler v. Carvana, LLC, et al
as 23-2858
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Saddler
Defendant / Appellee:
Carvana, LLC, Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation and Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc.
Saddler v. Carvana, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Richard Saddler
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC, Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation and Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
Saddler v. Hong et al
as 4:2021cv01185
Plaintiff:
Richard Saddler
Defendant:
Christine Hong and Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation v. Saddler
as 4:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation
Defendant:
Richard Saddler
3Rd Party Defendant:
Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc. and Carvana, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saddler v. Hong
as 4:2021cv01025
Plaintiff:
Richard Saddler
Defendant:
Christine Hong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Saddler v. Carvana LLC
as 4:2020cv00105
Plaintiff:
Richard Saddler
Defendant:
Carvana LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saddler v. Carvana, LLC
as 4:2019cv01646
Defendant:
Carvana, LLC
Plaintiff:
Richard Saddler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Saddler, Jr. v. Pennsbury Racquet & Athletic C, et al
as 16-4421
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RICHARD SADDLER, JR.
Defendant - Appellant:
PENNSBURY RACQUET & ATHLETIC CLUB LLC and BRADLEY S. WERNER
SADDLER v. PENNSBURY RACQUET & ATHLETIC CLUB LLC et al
as 2:2016cv01301
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SADDLER, JR.
Defendant:
PENNSBURY RACQUET & ATHLETIC CLUB LLC and BRADLEY S. WERNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Country Mutual Insurance Company v. Omicron Capital, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01476
Plaintiff:
Country Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Omicron Capital, LLC and Richard Saddler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
