Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation v. Saddler
| Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation |
| Richard Saddler |
| Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc. and Carvana, LLC |
| 4:2021cv01096 |
| September 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Jean C Hamilton |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Richard Saddler is granted until Monday, November 15, 2021, within which to respond to the Corporate Parties' Motion to Remand (ECF No. #8 ). Mr. Saddler's failure to do so will result in the Court's ruling on the Corporate Parties' unopposed motion. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 10/14/2021. (ANP)
|
|
Filing 12
Docket Text ORDER: Re: #11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice M. Thomas McFarland. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8895849) by Plaintiff Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Counter Defendant Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Third Party Defendants Carvana, LLC, Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)(McFarland, Marshall) filed by SilverRock Group, Inc., Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., Carvana, LLC ; ORDERED GRANTED. SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 10/01/2021. (ANP)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice M. Thomas McFarland. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $100 receipt number AMOEDC-8895849) by Plaintiff Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Counter Defendant Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Third Party Defendants Carvana, LLC, Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Certificate of Good Standing)(McFarland, Marshall) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED defendant/counter-claim plaintiff/third party plaintiff Richard Saddler's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #3 ] is GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Jean C. Hamilton on 09/30/2021. (ANP)
|
| Filing 9 MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re #8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court filed by Plaintiff Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Counter Defendant Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Third Party Defendants Carvana, LLC, Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc.. (Brasher, William) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to Remand Case to State Court by Plaintiff Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Counter Defendant Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Third Party Defendants Carvana, LLC, Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc.. (Brasher, William) |
| Filing 7 ENTRY of Appearance by William A. Brasher for Plaintiff Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Counter Defendant Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation, Third Party Defendants Carvana, LLC, Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc.. (Brasher, William) |
| Filing 6 Electronic Notice - Application for Admission needed as to Daniel S. Rabin. Review of case shows that Attorney Daniel S. Rabin is not currently a member of our Bar. For instructions on applying for bar admission or moving for pro hac vice admission, please follow the instructions located on our website at #https://www.moed.uscourts.gov under the Attorney tab. Notice only, no.pdf attached. (JWD) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint, THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against third party defendant Drive Time Automotive Group, Inc., SilverRock Group, Inc., Carvana, LLC, COUNTERCLAIM against plaintiff Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation by Richard Saddler.(JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Fri Sep 3 12:02:39 CDT 2021 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification: All non-governmental organizational parties (corporations, limited liability companies, limited liability partnerships) must file Disclosure of Organizational Interests Certificate # (moed-0001.pdf). Judge Assigned: Honorable Jean C. Hamilton. (JWD) |
| Filing 4 Petition (Removal/Transfer) Received From: St. Louis County Circuit Court, filed by Bridgecrest Acceptance Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Retail Installment and Security Agreement)(JWD) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Defendant Richard Saddler. (JWD) [Clerk's note: document contains case number of unrelated case number 4:21-cv-01025 due to filing error by defendant] (JWD). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF FILING NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Defendant Richard Saddler Sent To: Plaintiff and State Court. (JWD) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from St. Louis County Circuit Court, case number 21SL-CC01705 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by Richard Saddler. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - CFPB Action, #2 Exhibit B - Buyer's Guide, #3 Exhibit C - Gap Addendum to Retail Installment Contract, #4 Exhibit D - Retail Installment Contract and Security Agreement, #5 Exhibit E - Threatening Repossession, #6 Exhibit F - Carvana Request More Items, #7 G - Payment Receipt, #8 Exhibit H - State of North Carolina Signed Settlement Agreement 7-21-21, #9 Exhibit I - Retail Purchase Agreement, #10 Exhibit J - Warranty Agreement With SilverRock, #11 Civil Cover Sheet, #12 State Court File)(JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
