Marshall v. Parson et al
| Kevin Lamont Marshall |
| Michael L. Parson, Ann L. Precythe, Jeff Norman, Richard Adams, James Hurley and Corizon, Medical |
| 4:2021cv01500 |
| December 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
| Ronnie L White |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JKL) |
| ***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Thu Dec 23 15:01:32 CST 2021 (admin,) |
| Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Ronnie L. White. (JKL) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Kevin Lamont Marshall. (JKL) |
| Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Kevin Lamont Marshall. (JKL) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Plaintiff Kevin Lamont Marshall. (JKL) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant All Defendants Jury Demand,, filed by Kevin Lamont Marshall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Original Filing Form, #3 Exhibit Grievance Response, #4 Exhibit Grievance Materials, #5 Envelope)(JKL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
