Williams v. Dorr et al
Samuel H. Williams |
District Court Judge Dorr, District Court Judge Kays, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Shepherd, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Erickson, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Stras, Circuit Judges and Michael E. Gans |
4:2022cv00283 |
March 9, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Noelle C Collins |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 8. Copy sent to non-electronic party on this date. Fri Mar 11 09:03:40 CST 2022 (Bailey, Jennifer) |
ORDER RECEIPT: (see receipt) Docket No: 6,7. Fri Mar 11 12:02:33 CST 2022 (Davis, Kinica) |
Filing 8 Letter from Clerk sent to pro-se prisoner re:FRAP - all procedures for filing Notice of Appeal (copy of motion to proceed IFP on appeal attached and mailed) (Attachments: #1 Form Complaint Form) (JEB) |
Filing 7 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: In accordance with the Memorandum and Order entered herewith, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a fully-paid complaint. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/10/2022. (JEB) |
Filing 6 OPINION MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (See Full Order) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice to the filing of a fully-paid complaint. A separate order of dismissal will be entered herewith. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel [ECF No. #4 ] is DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall provide plaintiff with a form petition for filing an application for writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. If plaintiff wishes to file such a motion he shall file it in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri. Signed by District Judge Henry Edward Autrey on 3/10/2022. (JEB) |
Filing 5 Pursuant to Local Rule 2.08, the assigned/referred magistrate judge is designated and authorized by the court to exercise full authority in this assigned/referred action or matter under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 3401, including any case budgeting matters. (Potter, Jacob) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Samuel H. Williams. (JWD) |
Filing 3 Certified Inmate Account Statement by Plaintiff Samuel H. Williams. (JWD) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis under 42:1983 (prisoner) by Plaintiff Samuel H. Williams. (JWD) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against defendant Circuit Judges, District Court Judge Dorr, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Erickson, Michael E. Gans, District Court Judge Kays, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Shepherd, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Stras, Jury Demand, filed by Samuel H. Williams. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Documents from Other Courts, #2 Envelope)(JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Processed (see notice of electronic filing for distribution list) Wed Mar 9 15:01:19 CST 2022 (admin,) |
Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Noelle C. Collins. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click #here for the instructions. (JWD) |
***Complaint Letter Created. This is to advise you that this office has received and filed your complaint and has assigned it the above-referenced case number. (JWD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.