Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Roper v. Missouri, State of et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Roper
Defendant:
Missouri, State of, Michael E. Gans, Daniel F. Kellogg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goddard v. Phillips et al
as 1:2022cv01463
Plaintiff:
Regent J. Goddard
Defendant:
Beth Phillips, Michael E. Gans, Tonya Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Williams v. Dorr et al
as 4:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Samuel H. Williams
Defendant:
District Court Judge Dorr, District Court Judge Kays, Eighth Circuit Court Judge Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01433
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01432
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Matthew R. Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv01074
Plaintiff:
Randall David Due
Defendant:
USA, Staci M. Yandle, Eric Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Due v. USA et al
as 3:2021cv00868
Petitioner:
Randall David Due
Respondent:
USA, Matthew R. Hoffman, Brian D, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv02328
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey L.G. Johnson and Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency, United States Senate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Box v. Rosenstengel et al
as 4:2015cv01273
Plaintiff:
Keith Box
Defendant:
Nancy J Rosenstengel, Michael Jordan, Michael J Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
