United States of America v. Thompson

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Missouri Western District United States of America v. Thompson

United States of America v. Thompson

Case Number:	2:2005cv04046
Filed:	February 15, 2005
Court:	US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office:	Jefferson City Office
Presiding Judge:	Nanette K. Laughrey
Nature of Suit:	Contract: Recovery Student Loan
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 23, 2009	Filing 17 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. Pursuant to the Report, Recommendation and Order of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which there has been no timely objection, and a fter a de novo review of the record, the Court (1) finds Defendant in contempt of this Court for failing to appear for the judgment debtor examination and (2) directs the United States Marshal for the Western District of Missouri to arrest Defendant and bring him before the Court. (Kanies, Renea)
January 30, 2009	Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the U.S. District Court Judge, after making her own independent review of the record, hold the defendant in contempt of this Court, and direct the U.S. Marshal for the Western District of Missouri to arrest the defendan t, and bring him before the Court. ORDERED that the Clerk of the U.S. District Court is directed to serve a copy of this Report and Recommendation, by certified mail and regular U.S. Mail, upon the defendant, Anthony C. Thompson, at his last known a ddress of 5290 N. Creasy Springs Road, Columbia, Missouri 65202. Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 1/30/2009. (Bode, Kay) Modified on 2/2/2009 This document was mailed by certified and regular mail. 7003 3110 0004 0149 7167 (Bax, Laura).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 23, 2009

Filing 17 ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey adopting Report and Recommendations re 15 Report and Recommendations. Pursuant to the Report, Recommendation and Order of the United States Magistrate Judge, to which there has been no timely objection, and a fter a de novo review of the record, the Court (1) finds Defendant in contempt of this Court for failing to appear for the judgment debtor examination and (2) directs the United States Marshal for the Western District of Missouri to arrest Defendant and bring him before the Court. (Kanies, Renea)

January 30, 2009

Filing 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the U.S. District Court Judge, after making her own independent review of the record, hold the defendant in contempt of this Court, and direct the U.S. Marshal for the Western District of Missouri to arrest the defendan t, and bring him before the Court. ORDERED that the Clerk of the U.S. District Court is directed to serve a copy of this Report and Recommendation, by certified mail and regular U.S. Mail, upon the defendant, Anthony C. Thompson, at his last known a ddress of 5290 N. Creasy Springs Road, Columbia, Missouri 65202. Objections to R&R due by 2/9/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 1/30/2009. (Bode, Kay) Modified on 2/2/2009 This document was mailed by certified and regular mail. 7003 3110 0004 0149 7167 (Bax, Laura).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Thompson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?