Stark v. Simms et al
| 2:2006cv04277 |
| November 22, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| William A. Knox |
| Nanette K. Laughrey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
90
ORDER finding as moot 66 motion for summary judgment; finding as moot 69 motion for summary judgment; finding as moot 73 motion for summary judgment; granting 82 motion for sanctions; adopting Report and Recommendations re 85 . Plaintiff's claims are dismissed. Signed by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey on 9/15/09. (Bax, Laura)
|
|
Filing
85
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 66 69 73 MOTIONS for summary judgment filed by Charles Maines, Shawn P. Gerdiman, Todd Bitchell be denied as moot; 2 Complaint filed by Anthony C. Stark be dismissed, with prejudice; 82 MOTION for sanctions For Failure to Comply with Discovery Order filed by Charles Maines, Shawn P. Gerdiman be granted. Objections to R&R due by 6/30/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 6/10/2009. (skb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Stark v. Simms et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
