Irving v. Dormire et al
| 2:2006cv04306 |
| December 26, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| William A. Knox |
| Nanette K. Laughrey |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 48 Motion to Amend filed by William Irving, 57 Motion for Hearing filed by William Irving, 54 Motion for Order filed by William Irving, 60 Report and Recommendations, 61 Motion to Stay filed by William Irving, 52 Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by William Irving. ORDERED that plaintiff's claims are dismissed on collateral estoppel grounds. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 6/08/2009. (Sandridge, Susan)
|
|
Filing
60
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 48 MOTION to amend filed by William Irving be denied; 1 Complaint filed by William Irving be dismissed on collateral estoppel grounds; 57 MOTION for hearing, 54 MOTION for order, 52 MOTION for preliminary injunction filed by William Irving be denied, without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 5/5/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 4/15/2009. (skb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Irving v. Dormire et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
