Cotton-Schrichte v. Peate et al
Plaintiff: Dana Cotton-Schrichte
Defendant: Terry Moore, Shane Peate, Larry Crawford, Jennifer Miller and Missouri Department of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2007cv04052
Filed: March 13, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Missouri
Office: Jefferson City Office
County: Cole
Presiding Judge: William A. Knox
Presiding Judge: Nanette K. Laughrey
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 458 ORDER denying 445 motion for judgment as a matter of law, 448 motion for new trial. Signed on 6/23/2011 by Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth. (Bode, Kay)
February 28, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 444 CLERK'S JUDGMENT (Price, Jackie)
December 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 377 ORDER finding as moot 266 motion for summary judgment and dismissing, with prejudice, claims against Lt. Cary Grant; denying 267 motion for partial summary judgment against Shane Peate; granting 271 motion for summary judgment and dismissing claims against Missouri Department of Corrections, Tom Clements and Jennifer Miller. Signed on 12/23/2010 by Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth. (Bode, Kay)
October 22, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER denying 32 motion to dismiss case. Signed by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey on 10/21/08. (Bax, Laura)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cotton-Schrichte v. Peate et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Terry Moore
Represented By: Shannon Wright Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Shane Peate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Larry Crawford
Represented By: Shannon Wright Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Miller
Represented By: Shannon Wright Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Missouri Department of Corrections
Represented By: Shannon Wright Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dana Cotton-Schrichte
Represented By: Roger G Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?