Skipper v. Dormire et al
Daniel Paul Skipper |
Dave Dormire, Bill Galloway, Arthur Woods, John James, John Doe, - Sutton and David Murphy |
2:2007cv04201 |
October 2, 2007 |
US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
Jefferson City Office |
Cole |
William A. Knox |
Nanette K. Laughrey |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 227 ORDER denying 153 motion for summary judgment; granting 171 motion for summary judgment; denying 194 motion for summary judgment; denying 205 motion for leave to file; granting 207 motion for judgment on the pleadings; denying 211 motion to appoint counsel ; denying 212 motion ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 214 Report and Recommendations.; granting 216 motion for summary judgment; granting 225 motion for leave to file; denying 226 motion to compel Signed by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey on 1/23/09. (Price, Jackie) |
Filing 214 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 153 194 205 MOTIONS for summary judgment filed by Daniel Paul Skipper be denied; 171 MOTION for summary judgment filed by Leon Vickers, - Hardman, - Swartz, Jewel Cofield, Elizabeth J. Conley, - Sultrop be granted; 207 MOTION for judgment on the pleadings filed by David Murphy be granted; plaintiff's remaining claims be dismissed. Objections to R&R due by 12/11/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 11/21/2008. (skb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.