Voyles v. Dormire et al
| David Voyles |
| Dave Dormire, Thomas Baker and Pamela Swartz |
| 2:2008cv04089 |
| May 1, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Habeas Corpus (Prison Condition) Office |
| Cole |
| William A. Knox |
| Scott O. Wright |
| Both |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER denying as moot 36 motion for discovery; granting 10 motion to dismiss case; granting 15 motion to dismiss case; denying 28 motion to compel; adopting Report and Recommendations re 33 Report and Recommendations. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 1-21-09. (Morse, Judy)
|
|
Filing
33
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 28 MOTION to compel, treated as one for preliminary injunctive relief, filed by David Voyles, be denied; 1 Complaint filed by David Voyles be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1997e, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to bringing suit; 15 MOTION to dismiss filed by Dave Dormire for failure to state a claim against him be granted; 10 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Pamela Swartz, Thomas Baker be granted and claims against them be dismissed, without prejudice. Objections to R&R due by 12/10/2008. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 11/20/2008. (skb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
