Dayringer et al v. Webster et al
| Joesph Leroy Dayringer and James Eric Mansfield |
| David Webster, Arthur Wood and Bill Galloway |
| 2:2008cv04128 |
| June 9, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Cole |
| Prisoner Pro Se |
| Scott O. Wright |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
180
ORDER granting 178 motion to amend; denying 178 motion for new trial, motion for hearing. Signed on 4/272012 by Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth. (Bode, Kay)
|
|
Filing
174
ORDER denying requests of Joseph Leroy Dayringer and James Eric Mansfield for declaratory relief and dismissing claims, with prejudice. Signed on 2/24/2012 by Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth. (Bode, Kay)
|
|
Filing
124
ORDER denying 112 117 123 motions to dismiss; granting 118 motion to amend. Signed on 9/7/2011 by Magistrate Judge Matt J. Whitworth. (Bode, Kay)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 19 defendants' motion to dismiss case; adopting 23 Report and Recommendation of March 18, 2009. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 5/19/2009. (Sandridge, Susan)
|
|
Filing
23
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 19 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Bill Galloway, David Webster, Arthur Wood be denied. Objections to R&R due by 4/7/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 3/18/2009. (skb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
