Downum v. Long et al
| Raymond L. Downum |
| Steve Long and Mo. Board of Probation & Parole |
| 2:2008cv04207 |
| August 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights Office |
| Cole |
| William A. Knox |
| Scott O. Wright |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
ORDER granting 16 motion to dismiss case.; adopting Report and Recommendations re 24 Report and Recommendations.; granting 25 motion for extension of time(Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/8/2009 unless otherwise directed by the court., Reply suggestions due by 10/8/2009 unless otherwise directed by the court) Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 9/23/09. (James, Carrie)
|
|
Filing
24
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 1 Complaint filed by Raymond L. Downum be dismissed on res judicata grounds or, alternatively, if not dismissed on these grounds, for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; 16 MOTION to dismiss case filed by Steve Long, Mo. Board of Probation & Parole be granted. Objections to R&R due by 8/24/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 8/4/2009. (skb)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8 ; dismissing plaintiff's claims against defendant Long and dismissing plaintiff's damage claims. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 11-25-2008. (Morse, Judy)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
