Hammett v. Cofield et al
| Mark Hammett |
| J. Cofield, Leon Vickers, Thomas Baker and Beth Clad |
| 2:2009cv04123 |
| June 19, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Cole |
| William A. Knox |
| Scott O. Wright |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
15
ORDER that 12 plaintiff's new claims of retaliation which he attempts to add in response to dismissal of his claims are dismissed, without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that 11 the Report and Recommendation of October 22, 2009, is adopted . It is further ORDERED that plaintiff's claims are dismissed, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. It is further ORDERED that 2 13 plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction and for reconsideration, treated as objections, are denied. Signed by District Judge Scott O. Wright on 11/16/2009. (Sandridge, Susan)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 1 Complaint filed by Mark Hammett be dismissed, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted; 2 MOTION for preliminary injunction filed by Mark Hammett be denied. Objections to R&R due by 11/12/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 10/22/2009. (skb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
