Walker v. Missouri Attorney General et al
| DeMun D Walker |
| Missouri Attorney General and John and Jane Doe |
| 2:2009cv04129 |
| July 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Cole |
| William A. Knox |
| Nanette K. Laughrey |
| None |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER denying 15 motion for reconsideration; denying 16 motion for the US to intervene. Signed by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey on 1/21/10. (Bax, Laura)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER denying 3 motion for judgment on the pleadings; denying 6 motion ; denying 9 motion to amend/correct; adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendations.; denying 13 motion. Plaintiff's claims are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by District Judge Nanette K. Laughrey on 11/12/09. (Bax, Laura)
|
|
Filing
11
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that 6 MOTION for order for release from custody, 3 MOTION for judgment on the pleadings, 9 MOTION to amend filed by DeMun D. Walker be denied; 1 Complaint filed by DeMun D. Walker be dismissed, without prejudice, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A, for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted. Objections to R&R due by 10/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge William A. Knox on 9/16/2009. (skb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
