Osment Models, Inc. et al v. Mike's Train House, Inc.
| Osment Models Inc and O Co. |
| Mike's Train House, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv04189 |
| September 22, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Missouri |
| Jefferson City Office |
| Camden |
| Nanette K. Laughrey |
| Plaintiff |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
312
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrye. Defendant Mike's Train House's Motion to Reconsider the Court's Summary Judgment Order, and, in the Alternative, to Re-open Discovery and Advance the Trial Date [Doc. # 284] is DENIED. (Kanies, Renea)
|
|
Filing
267
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Mike's Train House's Motion for Summary Judgment 161 is DENIED.(Smith, Fran)
|
|
Filing
251
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Osment's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. # 130] is GRANTED. Further, Mike's motion [Doc. # 183] is DENIED. (Kanies, Renea)
|
|
Filing
239
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Osment's motions to exclude the testimony of Ralph Oman [Doc. # 167] and testimony of Bernard C. Dietz [Doc. # 169] are GRANTED.(Kanies, Renea)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER entered by Judge Nanette Laughrey. Mike's Train's Motion to Transfer Venue [Doc. # 13] is DENIED. (Kanies, Renea)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Missouri Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
